The New Technical SEO Playbook: What Still Matters (and What Doesn’t) in 2025

In the early days of SEO, technical optimization was everything. Get your title tags right, build a sitemap, fix broken links, and you were halfway to ranking. But in 2025, the SEO landscape is fundamentally different.

Now you’re not just optimizing for Google—you’re optimizing for AI models, answer engines, and systems that don’t even need to show your link to use your content. Tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overviews don’t follow the traditional rules. They synthesize, summarize, and cite. And if your site isn’t technically structured for both traditional crawling and AI parsing, you’re invisible.

This is your updated field manual—the technical SEO playbook built for a hybrid world of crawlers and LLMs. Whether you’re a hands-on founder or a technical SEO pro, this is how to make sure your site is fast, structured, discoverable, and ready for AI.



What Is Technical SEO (Then vs. Now)


Technical SEO has always referred to the behind-the-scenes elements that make your website accessible, indexable, and performant. It’s the part of SEO that doesn’t deal with copywriting or backlinks—but with the code, architecture, and signals that help search engines understand and trust your content.


Then:

In the classic SEO world, technical SEO meant:

  • A valid robots.txt and sitemap.xml
  • Fast page load times
  • Canonical URLs
  • Clean internal links
  • Schema markup to enhance listings
  • Crawlable navigation


The goal? To make sure search engines could easily crawl your site, understand your structure, and serve your pages in search results.


Now (2025):

Much of that still applies—but with a critical difference:

Search engines now include AI-powered LLMs that don’t crawl your site the same way. They parse the HTML. They extract answers. They weigh semantic clarity over traditional ranking signals.

So while Googlebot may still crawl and index, GPTBot and PerplexityBot are parsing your content to summarize it. That means technical SEO is no longer just about visibility in search—it’s about answerability.

Your pages must now be:

  • Crawlable
  • Cleanly structured
  • Fast-loading
  • Semantically scannable
  • LLM-readable


In other words: Technical SEO is still the foundation—but the use cases have evolved. You’re not just trying to rank. You’re trying to become the source that AI relies on.


Why Technical SEO Still Matters in an AI-Driven World

It’s tempting to think that technical SEO is losing relevance. After all, if ChatGPT or Google’s AI Overview can pull an answer from a webpage without showing the link, what’s the point of obsessing over crawl budgets or schema?


The reality is: technical SEO matters more than ever—just for different reasons.

1. AI Can’t Summarize What It Can’t Parse

LLMs like ChatGPT and Perplexity don’t “crawl” the web like Googlebot. They rely on data that’s been parsed, vectorized, and stored. The clearer your structure, the more likely your content is to be included in that data pipeline.

That means:

  • Consistent HTML structure = easier parsing
  • Proper headers (H1, H2, etc.) = clearer hierarchy
  • Schema markup = richer semantic context
  • Clear author/date fields = higher trust for AI models


If your content isn’t semantically scannable, it’s unlikely to get cited—let alone summarized or linked.

2. Google’s AI Overviews Use Structured Data

Despite Google claiming AI Overviews “generate their own summaries,” the reality is they heavily depend on structured input—like page metadata, schema, site speed, and page quality.

Google doesn’t just want an answer. It wants the best answer, and it uses traditional SEO signals to decide what’s trustworthy enough to summarize.

That means:

  • Fast page loads
  • Valid schema
  • Crawlable, clean HTML
  • Canonical clarity
  • Internal linking


All of these technical elements signal trust. Even if AI writes the answer, it still needs clean inputs to do it.

3. You’re No Longer Competing for Rank—You’re Competing for Inclusion

In the past, you optimized for rankings. Now, you’re optimizing to be part of the LLM’s knowledge base.


To be included, your site must:

  • Load reliably (AI systems often skip or truncate error-prone content)
  • Avoid render-blocking scripts
  • Present content clearly without pop-ups or gated distractions
  • Avoid broken links and dead ends


Even if you’re not chasing “Position 1” in Google, you still want your content to show up when someone asks ChatGPT a question. That’s the new SERP.

4. Technical SEO = Answer Architecture

Today, SEO is no longer about just being found. It’s about being understood.

Clean, structured, well-linked content is easier for AI and crawlers alike to digest. Think of technical SEO now as answer architecture—the way you build your site to ensure it can power both SERPs and AI responses.


The Key Components of Technical SEO in 2025

The technical SEO toolkit hasn’t vanished—it’s just evolved. In 2025, it’s no longer about checking boxes for Google’s crawler; it’s about making your content clean, interconnected, and machine-readable for both traditional search engines and emerging AI systems.

Here’s a breakdown of the foundational components of technical SEO today—and what role each plays in helping your site get found, parsed, and cited.


Schema Markup (Structured Data)

Structured data is still essential for surfacing your content in enriched formats like AI summaries, featured snippets, and knowledge graphs.

  • Why it matters: Helps AI and Google understand your content’s purpose
  • What to focus on: Article, FAQPage, Breadcrumb, LocalBusiness
  • Avoid overuse: Don’t auto-inject schema just because a plugin tells you to
  • Use JSON-LD: It remains the preferred format


Schema helps machines assign confidence to your content. That’s exactly what LLMs need when choosing which sources to summarize.

robots.txt (Crawling Controls)

Controlling what gets indexed—and what doesn’t—is a foundational technical SEO move.

  • Why it matters: Prevents duplicate content and secures private/gated content
  • In 2025: It's also used to allow or block LLM bots like GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and others
  • Best practice: Be explicit. Allow what’s helpful. Disallow what’s irrelevant or sensitive.


Blocking too much may prevent your content from being cited. Blocking nothing may leak data you didn’t want exposed. Use with intent.

Sitemaps (Human and Machine Indexing)


Sitemaps ensure that search engines and AI indexers know what pages exist—and in what hierarchy.

  • Why it matters: Informs crawlers of page structure, hierarchy, and updates
  • Best practices: Maintain both XML and human-readable sitemaps
  • Bonus: Include lastmod and priority tags to reinforce crawl hints
  • Tip: Ping Google and Bing when your sitemap updates


In a world where AI scrapers and custom crawlers might index you before Google does, your sitemap is your front door.

Gated Content Strategy

Modern SEO requires balancing lead capture with discoverability.

  • Why it matters: LLMs and crawlers can’t summarize what they can’t access
  • How to win: Use previews (intro paragraphs, content summaries)
  • Avoid cloaking: Don’t serve different content to bots than humans
  • Best approach: Use schema and partial indexing to expose value, not the whole thing


This is where smart content previews and content hierarchy design play a huge role.

Internal Linking and Site Architecture

Forget 1,000 backlinks—start with 100 strong internal links.

  • Why it matters: Distributes authority, improves crawlability, reinforces topical clusters
  • Best practice: Ensure every blog post links to 3–5 others in its category
  • AI bonus: Internal linking creates semantic context that AI models use to validate content clusters


In 2025, internal linking isn’t just for SEO—it’s for AI understanding and structured knowledge development.


Meta Tags and Canonical Elements

They may not carry as much weight as before, but they’re still essential signals.

  • Meta Titles: Write them for clarity, not keyword density
  • Descriptions: Used by AI systems to preview page relevance
  • Canonical Tags: Still your #1 defense against duplication issues


Think of these as crawl hygiene tools—you still need them clean and accurate.

Page Speed and Core Web Vitals

A fast site is still a better site—for users and bots alike.

  • Why it matters: Crawlers and LLMs prefer fast, accessible pages
  • What to monitor: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Time to Interactive (TTI), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
  • Tools to use: Google Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, WebPageTest


Speed is no longer a "ranking factor"—it’s a content accessibility factor. If your page doesn’t load fast enough to parse, it doesn’t get used.


How to Build a Future-Proof Technical SEO Stack

A future-proof SEO stack is less about tools and more about systems. Tools change. APIs break. Algorithms evolve. But the foundation of solid technical SEO—structure, speed, clarity, and semantic alignment—endures.


This section breaks down the architecture and mindset you need to build technical SEO infrastructure that adapts to both search engines and AI.


1. Choose a Flexible, SEO-Ready CMS

Your CMS shouldn’t fight your SEO strategy—it should support it.

  • Use platforms that allow clean code output and schema injection (WordPress, Ghost, custom Flask/Django builds)
  • Avoid bloated page builders with nested div nightmares
  • Ensure it supports custom fields for meta titles, descriptions, and canonical tags


⚠️ Bonus Tip: Make sure your CMS outputs consistent HTML headers and lets you control structured data.

2. Crawl and Audit Frequently

Technical SEO isn’t static—your site will break in small, invisible ways over time. Regular audits prevent SEO decay.

  • Use tools like Screaming Frog, Sitebulb, or Ahrefs Site Audit
  • Run crawls monthly to check for:
  • Broken links
  • Canonical tag conflicts
  • Redirect chains
  • Unindexed pages
  • Schema errors
  • Orphaned pages


Keep a changelog of key site updates to correlate with crawl anomalies.

3. Automate Internal Linking

If you’re running a content-heavy site, manual internal linking won’t scale.

  • Use an automated system that:
  • Detects contextual keywords
  • Filters by category
  • Inserts only one link per anchor per post
  • Track anchor term frequency and diversity to avoid over-optimization


Automation here isn’t about volume—it’s about precision and semantic reinforcement.


4. Build Semantic Site Architecture

You want AI models and crawlers to see your content as organized clusters—not isolated posts.

  • Use category-based URL structures
  • Organize your navigation around topics, not just pages
  • Keep flat URL depths (avoid long nested URLs)
  • Build topic hubs with clear interlinking


Think: “If a machine landed on this page, would it understand what this site is about?”

5. Integrate AI Visibility Testing into Your Process

AI is already “reading” your site—test how well it understands you.

  • Ask ChatGPT: “What does [yourdomain] do?”
  • Ask Perplexity.ai to recommend top resources in your space—are you listed?
  • Paste URLs and see what gets summarized and what gets ignored
  • Use your content in LLM prompts to see which pages produce coherent, direct answers


If AI doesn’t know what you offer, you have a technical SEO problem—even if your rankings are fine.

6. Track Technical Metrics Like a Product Manager

Treat your site like a living product. Assign ownership of metrics like:

  • Crawl coverage
  • Indexed pages
  • Sitemap health
  • Structured data validation
  • Server uptime
  • Redirect hygiene


Use a combination of Google Search Console, Indexing APIs, and performance dashboards to stay ahead.


LLM Indexability and AI-Crawling Essentials

Google isn’t your only audience anymore.

Large Language Models (LLMs) like those powering ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok, and Claude are crawling, parsing, and summarizing the internet—and they’re doing it differently than traditional search engines.


This section explains what “indexability” means in an AI context and how to make your content LLM-ready so it’s not just visible, but cited.

1. LLMs Don’t Crawl Like Google—They Parse and Embed

Where Googlebot explores links and indexes pages by URL, LLMs:

  • Ingest your content into vector databases
  • Parse meaning using semantic models, not keyword frequency
  • Extract answers based on language clarity and authority signals


That means content must be:

  • Concise – models struggle with bloated or redundant writing
  • Structured – clear headers, lists, and summaries
  • Rich with context – internal links and semantic cues help build relevance
  • Not blocked – GPTBot, CCbot, and others must be allowed in robots.txt


Think of this as optimizing not for a web index, but for a giant knowledge base.


2. Use Structured Signals to Aid Answer Selection

While LLMs technically don’t “read” schema the way Google does, structured data helps reinforce:

  • Topic boundaries
  • Entity relationships
  • Author/source credibility
  • Recency and relevance


This is especially important for inclusion in AI responses. For example:

  • FAQ schema helps your content show up as direct Q&A
  • Author/date markup boosts credibility for time-sensitive info
  • Breadcrumbs provide context for content hierarchy


These are subtle trust signals LLMs use to decide whether you’re “the answer” or not.

3. Design for Answerability

The best content for LLM indexing has:

  • A clear, single-topic focus per page
  • Sub headers that reflect real user questions
  • Answer blocks early in the content (TL;DR, summaries)
  • Credible source structure (visible author, date, site title)


Pro tip: Run your own page through GPT and ask it to summarize the article. If it can’t pull a clean answer, neither can Perplexity.


4. Control Access Strategically

You may want to gate your content—but you also want AI discoverability.

Best practices:

  • Expose a strong preview (first 300–500 words)
  • Include schema on preview content
  • Never cloak (don’t show one thing to bots and another to users)
  • Allow access to GPTBot in your robots.txt, but disallow private paths


You want AI to know your content exists—but not give away the full value if it’s behind a lead form.

5. Track What LLMs Know About You

Use this checklist to test your visibility:

  • Ask ChatGPT: “What is [your business]?” — does it give a coherent response?
  • Ask Perplexity: “What are the best resources for [your industry]?” — are you cited?
  • Use GPT to summarize a blog post on your site — what does it pull?


If you're invisible to LLMs, it’s often not a content problem—it’s a technical one.

The Technical SEO Checklist for 2025

Use this as your go-to reference for auditing your site or implementing a future-ready SEO stack:

Crawling & Indexing

  • robots.txt allows Googlebot and LLM bots (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, etc.)
  • Sitemap.xml is active, submitted to GSC, and up-to-date
  • Pages return correct status codes (200 for live, 301/410 where appropriate)
  • Canonical tags are implemented and not conflicting
  • No duplicate content or crawl traps


Site Speed & Performance

  • Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, FID) are passing
  • JavaScript is deferred or async where possible
  • Lazy-loading is implemented for images and iframes
  • Gzip or Brotli compression is enabled
  • Server response time is under 200ms


Semantic Structure & LLM Readiness

  • Every page has a clear H1 and consistent heading hierarchy
  • FAQ schema is used where applicable
  • Author and date are present and structured
  • TL;DR or intro summary appears near the top of posts
  • Pages are focused on a single core topic

Internal Linking & Site Architecture

  • Blog posts link to 3–5 related articles
  • Navigation reflects topic clusters, not just flat pages
  • No orphan pages (every page is linked from somewhere else)
  • Anchor text is descriptive, not generic ("click here", etc.)


Structured Data

  • JSON-LD schema is used (not Microdata)
  • Article, FAQ, and Breadcrumb schema implemented as needed
  • Schema is validated using Google’s Rich Results Test
  • Organization or LocalBusiness schema present on homepage
  • Avoid injecting irrelevant or excessive schema types


Content Access & Visibility

  • Gated content includes preview text and schema
  • Sensitive content is blocked in robots.txt only if needed
  • Pages aren’t hiding content behind client-side rendering
  • Structured previews are exposed for AI crawling where possible


I personally fact checked this document in Google Gemini. Here is its response:


Certainly. Here's a fact check of the provided document, "The New Technical SEO Playbook: What Still Matters (and What Doesn’t) in 2025." Please note that some aspects of SEO involve strategy and prediction, which can be subjective. This fact check will focus on the technical accuracy and alignment with generally accepted SEO principles.



Document Title: The New Technical SEO Playbook: What Still Matters (and What Doesn’t) in 2025


General Overview:


The document discusses the evolution of Technical SEO, especially concerning the rise of AI models and LLMs in search. It outlines what remains crucial in SEO practices in 2025 and how to optimize for a hybrid environment of traditional crawlers and AI parsers.


Fact Check:

  1. Technical SEO Definition (Then vs. Now):
  • The document accurately describes the historical aspects of Technical SEO (robots.txt, sitemaps, page speed, etc.).
  • It correctly identifies the shift towards optimizing for AI models and LLMs, emphasizing "answerability" and semantic clarity. This aligns with current trends in SEO discussions.
  1. Importance of Technical SEO in an AI-Driven World:
  • The document's points about AI needing parsable and structured content are accurate. LLMs do rely on structured data and well-organized HTML to understand and summarize content.
  • The statement that "Google’s AI Overviews Use Structured Data" is consistent with available information about how Google uses structured data to enrich its search results.
  • The concept of competing for "inclusion" in LLM knowledge bases rather than just ranking is a forward-thinking view of SEO's evolution.
  1. Key Components of Technical SEO in 2025:
  • Schema Markup: Correctly identified as essential for AI understanding and enriched results. Recommendations to use JSON-LD and avoid overuse are standard best practices.
  • robots.txt: The document accurately notes the use of robots.txt to manage LLM bots.
  • Sitemaps: The importance of XML and human-readable sitemaps is correctly emphasized.
  • Internal Linking: Accurately described as critical for distributing authority and aiding AI understanding.
  • Page Speed and Core Web Vitals: Correctly identified as crucial for accessibility and user experience.
  1. Building a Future-Proof Technical SEO Stack:
  • The suggestions for choosing a flexible CMS, frequent crawling, automating internal linking, building semantic architecture, integrating AI visibility testing, and tracking technical metrics are all valid and important.
  • The advice to crawl and audit frequently using tools like Screaming Frog, Sitebulb, or Ahrefs Site Audit is consistent with industry practice.
  1. LLM Indexability and AI-Crawling Essentials:
  • The explanation of how LLMs parse and embed content is accurate. They do not crawl in the same way as traditional search engines but focus on semantic understanding.
  • The use of structured signals to aid answer selection and design for answerability are sound recommendations.
  1. Technical SEO Checklist for 2025:
  • The checklist provided is comprehensive and covers the major aspects of technical SEO.
  • Items such as robots.txt, sitemaps, canonical tags, site speed, semantic structure, internal linking, structured data, and content access are all critical components of technical SEO.


Conclusion:


The document generally provides accurate information about Technical SEO and its evolution in the context of AI and LLMs. The recommendations and explanations align with current SEO trends and best practices. Some aspects are predictive, but the core concepts and advice are well-grounded in established SEO principles.




Therefore, the document is factually sound and provides valuable insights into the future of Technical SEO.


Here is what Perplexity had to say:

Fact Check: "The New Technical SEO Playbook: What Still Matters (and What Doesn’t) in 2025"

Below is a fact check of the main claims and recommendations in your document, using current best practices, industry sources, and the latest updates on SEO and AI-powered search as of mid-2025.


Technical SEO: Then vs. Now

  • The document accurately describes the evolution of technical SEO from a focus on crawlability and indexation (robots.txt, sitemaps, canonical URLs, schema, internal links) to a broader concern with how AI models and LLMs (Large Language Models) parse and synthesize web content. This is supported by current industry analysis, which notes that while traditional SEO fundamentals remain important, LLMs and AI answer engines now require content to be structured, semantically clear, and machine-readable to be included in AI-generated responses.

AI Models and Search Engines

  • The claim that tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overviews do not "crawl" the web in the same way as Googlebot is accurate. LLMs typically ingest content through web crawling or partnerships, then parse and embed content into vector databases for semantic retrieval, rather than relying solely on keyword-based indexing.
  • The assertion that technical SEO is now about "answerability" and not just "visibility" is correct. AI models extract answers, and being included in their knowledge base depends on clear, structured, and accessible content.

Structured Data and Schema Markup

  • The importance of schema markup (structured data) for surfacing content in AI summaries, featured snippets, and knowledge graphs is well-supported. Google and other search engines continue to use structured data to enhance understanding and presentation of content. JSON-LD remains the preferred format, and overusing schema (e.g., auto-injecting irrelevant types) is discouraged.
  • The document is correct that LLMs do not "read" schema in the same way as Google, but structured data still provides valuable context and trust signals for both traditional and AI systems.

robots.txt and Crawling Controls

  • The advice to use robots.txt not only for Googlebot but also to allow or block LLM-specific bots (like GPTBot and PerplexityBot) is accurate. These bots respect robots.txt directives, and site owners should be explicit about what is allowed or disallowed to balance exposure and privacy.

Sitemaps

  • Maintaining both XML and human-readable sitemaps, including lastmod and priority tags, remains best practice for both search engines and AI crawlers. Sitemaps help ensure all relevant pages are discoverable and indexed.

Gated Content

  • The document correctly notes that LLMs and crawlers cannot summarize content they cannot access. Using content previews and schema for gated content is a recommended approach, while cloaking (serving different content to bots and users) should be avoided as it violates search engine guidelines.

Internal Linking and Site Architecture

  • The emphasis on internal linking and topical clusters is accurate. Internal links help distribute authority, improve crawlability, and reinforce semantic context, which benefits both traditional search engines and AI models.

Meta Tags, Canonical Elements, and Page Speed

  • Meta tags (titles, descriptions) and canonical tags remain important for crawl hygiene and duplication control, though their direct ranking influence has diminished. Page speed and Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, FID) are still critical for user experience and accessibility, which in turn affect both crawling and inclusion in AI-generated responses.

CMS and Technical Stack Recommendations

  • The recommendation to use a flexible, SEO-ready CMS that outputs clean code, supports schema, and allows control over meta fields is consistent with current best practices. Avoiding bloated page builders and ensuring consistent HTML structure are also valid points.

Crawling, Auditing, and Automation

  • Regular site audits using tools like Screaming Frog, Ahrefs, or Sitebulb are essential for maintaining technical health. Automating internal linking for large sites is increasingly necessary for scalability and semantic reinforcement.

LLM Indexability and AI-Crawling

  • The document accurately describes that LLMs ingest, parse, and embed content for semantic retrieval rather than traditional keyword-based indexing. Optimizing for LLMs involves concise, structured, and context-rich content, with access allowed for relevant bots.
  • The suggestion to test AI visibility by querying ChatGPT, Perplexity, or GPT about your site is a practical, up-to-date method for gauging inclusion in AI knowledge bases.

Technical SEO Checklist for 2025

  • The checklist provided (robots.txt, sitemaps, status codes, canonical tags, Core Web Vitals, semantic structure, FAQ schema, author/date markup, etc.) aligns with current recommendations for both traditional and AI-focused SEO1.


Summary Table: Major Claims and Accuracy



Conclusion

The document is highly accurate and reflects the current state of technical SEO as it applies to both traditional search engines and AI/LLM-powered answer engines in 2025. The recommendations are consistent with best practices and the latest industry knowledge. No major factual errors or misleading claims were found.



Let's Boost Your Rankings, Fast

Get a free SEO teardown + backlink plan.

Check My SEO